Suppose I have two concepts A and B. Lets say existence of one is impossible without other. For example: A doesn't exist or cannot be defined without asserting the existence of B.
So A and B depend on each other. Till now there is no bias in A and B. A is in potential same as B. Mathematically they carry same weightage.
Now if someone out of nowhere believes that A is better than B, it is absurd, isn't it.
Concepts like "Good" and "Bad", "Right" and "Wrong" etc are of the same nature as A and B. Potentially they are same, but there is this mysterious bias that we have assimilated from nowhere in us that Good is better than Bad and Right is superior to Wrong.
How does that happen? Did you ever wonder.
For me this mysterious bias is Maya. The great illusion.
Magnify your perception and give credit to things as they are without attaching bias. Enlightenment is all about that.
So A and B depend on each other. Till now there is no bias in A and B. A is in potential same as B. Mathematically they carry same weightage.
Now if someone out of nowhere believes that A is better than B, it is absurd, isn't it.
Concepts like "Good" and "Bad", "Right" and "Wrong" etc are of the same nature as A and B. Potentially they are same, but there is this mysterious bias that we have assimilated from nowhere in us that Good is better than Bad and Right is superior to Wrong.
How does that happen? Did you ever wonder.
For me this mysterious bias is Maya. The great illusion.
Magnify your perception and give credit to things as they are without attaching bias. Enlightenment is all about that.
No comments:
Post a Comment